The choice of a content management system (CMS) often starts with analyzing available extensions. However, for institutional websites and technical portfolios, it is more effective to adopt a reverse approach: first, define the essential needs of the core of the site, and then consider the extensions.
Start with the problem, not the store
Identify the requirements of your project, such as languages, content types, search engine optimization (SEO), contact forms, search functionalities, backup, and who will be responsible for editing the content. If the list of needs already requires several extensions, it is a sign that the base CMS may not meet your demands. What needs to be in the core
What needs to be in the core
The core of the CMS should include fundamental features, such as robust authentication, content versioning, metadata for SEO, permanent URLs, legal pages, and a clear separation between the public part of the site and the administrative interface. Other functionalities can be treated as secondary integrations but should not be the foundation of the system.
Plugins: when they help and when they hinder
Plugins can be an efficient solution when they meet a specific need and have active support. However, they can become problematic when accumulating essential functions, such as login, cache, and SEO, in codes that are not under your control, increasing vulnerability and the complexity of site management.
A short decision list
When choosing a CMS, ask the following questions: what functionalities are indispensable without using plugins? How often does the technology used require updates? What is the impact if an extension is no longer supported? Is there a possibility of customization without relying on an eternal fork of the system?
Conclusion
For those seeking a leaner solution, it is advisable to explore CMS options upon request. The ideal CMS is one that you can manage securely and effectively over the years.
If you are looking for a lean alternative upon request, also see Ready CMS upon request.